Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support leader election to be more flexible about operator deployment #709

Closed
pebrc opened this issue May 1, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3632
Closed

Support leader election to be more flexible about operator deployment #709

pebrc opened this issue May 1, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3632
Assignees
@barkbay
Labels
>enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality

Comments

@pebrc
Copy link
Collaborator

pebrc commented May 1, 2019

We currently rely on stateful sets which is the default in kubebuilder. Leader election could allow us to be a bit more flexible wrt to the k8s resource and allow the use of the operator in environments that only support deployments for operators.
@pebrc pebrc added >enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality loe:medium labels May 1, 2019
@anyasabo
Copy link
Contributor

We may want to expand this to support deployments and leader elections as is the default in kubebuilder v2

@pebrc pebrc removed the loe:medium label Apr 27, 2020
@anyasabo anyasabo mentioned this issue May 7, 2020
Closed
@barkbay barkbay self-assigned this Aug 11, 2020
@barkbay barkbay mentioned this issue Aug 14, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@barkbay barkbay

Labels
>enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add operator election support barkbay/cloud-on-k8s
3 participants
@pebrc @barkbay @anyasabo