Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[5] Replace PSPs for logging stack #1446

Closed
Tracked by #1218
Ajarmar opened this issue Mar 10, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1477
Closed
Tracked by #1218

[5] Replace PSPs for logging stack #1446

Ajarmar opened this issue Mar 10, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1477
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature New feature or request

Comments

@Ajarmar
Copy link
Contributor

Ajarmar commented Mar 10, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We have now investigated both PSA and gatekeeper as a replacement for PSPs. We have decided that we want to try to replace it with a combination of both.

Describe the solution you'd like
The idea is to use PSA for coarse grained control and gatekeeper for fine grained control. The PSA used in a namespace have to match the most privileged pod in that namespace, then we use gatekeeper to lock everything down as much as possible.

Use #1444 as a basis.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

Definition of done:

  • We have replaced all PSPs for the logging stack (OpenSearch and fluentd).
@Ajarmar Ajarmar added the kind/feature New feature or request label Mar 10, 2023
@Ajarmar Ajarmar mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2023
19 tasks
@Ajarmar Ajarmar changed the title Replace PSPs for logging stack [3] Replace PSPs for logging stack Mar 10, 2023
@Ajarmar Ajarmar changed the title [3] Replace PSPs for logging stack [5] Replace PSPs for logging stack Mar 10, 2023
@aarnq aarnq self-assigned this Mar 15, 2023
@aarnq aarnq linked a pull request Mar 27, 2023 that will close this issue
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants