You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we have SDL code in at least src/library_sdl.js and some also in src/library_browser.js. Alon added link flags -s NO_FILESYSTEM=1 and -s NO_BROWSER=1 in relation to #2545 , and in the same style, we should add a link flag -s NO_SDL=1 or similar, which would strip out all the handwritten JS code that implements Emscripten's SDL 1.3.
The motivation for this is with our SDL 2 implementation, which seems to have some bits still using these handwritten JS paths, so this flag would help explicitly confirm that the SDL 2 port would properly use only the SDL2 code. Also, this would secondarily benefit other codebases to allow them explicitly opt out of linking to SDL at all.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because there has been no activity in the past 2 years. It will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 7 days. Feel free to re-open at any time if this issue is still relevant.
Currently we have SDL code in at least
src/library_sdl.js
and some also insrc/library_browser.js
. Alon added link flags-s NO_FILESYSTEM=1
and-s NO_BROWSER=1
in relation to #2545 , and in the same style, we should add a link flag-s NO_SDL=1
or similar, which would strip out all the handwritten JS code that implements Emscripten's SDL 1.3.The motivation for this is with our SDL 2 implementation, which seems to have some bits still using these handwritten JS paths, so this flag would help explicitly confirm that the SDL 2 port would properly use only the SDL2 code. Also, this would secondarily benefit other codebases to allow them explicitly opt out of linking to SDL at all.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: