Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use lifecycle::is_present() for dealing with deprecated arguments #650

Closed
jamesmbaazam opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Use lifecycle::is_present() for dealing with deprecated arguments #650

jamesmbaazam opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@jamesmbaazam
Copy link
Contributor

jamesmbaazam commented May 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

I'm just learning about lifecycle::is_present(). Might be worth applying the recommendations in the linked reference since we're already importing {lifecycle}. Yet to weigh the cons of this approach vs what we have implemented here. Definitely not a priority for v1.5.0 release.
@jamesmbaazam
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this issue because it introduces a backlog with minimal benefits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jamesmbaazam