Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Improvement] De-enshrine validateUserOp #14

Open
adam-alchemy opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[Improvement] De-enshrine validateUserOp #14

adam-alchemy opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
simplification Simplification of standard standards improvement

Comments

@adam-alchemy
Copy link

(Previous discussion: community call 1, eth-magicians)

  • The special status of validateUserOp in ERC-6900 is key to allowing custom account security settings and automations. However, with proposed changes to ERC-4337’s UserOperation struct and RIP-7560’s validateTransaction, we do not want to be stuck re-enshrining more special functions. We need to define a strategy for functions to have implementation-switching as needed to have modular validation functions.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
simplification Simplification of standard standards improvement
Projects
ERC-6900 v0.8
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@fangting-alchemy @adam-alchemy