You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your awesome work. I noticed the InterHand2.6M dataset used in the paper has 257K 2D hands in the training set, however, the latest released InterHand2.6M has 528K manually labeled 2D hands for training. So I guess your reported results on InterHand2.6M are based on a subset of the latest released InterHand2.6M. Is it correct? If so, could you please update the results of InterHand2.6M based on the public released version?
Thanks a lot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for your awesome work. I noticed the InterHand2.6M dataset used in the paper has 257K 2D hands in the training set, however, the latest released InterHand2.6M has 528K manually labeled 2D hands for training. So I guess your reported results on InterHand2.6M are based on a subset of the latest released InterHand2.6M. Is it correct? If so, could you please update the results of InterHand2.6M based on the public released version?
Thanks a lot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: