Should Status lists be used for the validation of attestations?

[vilmosa]

According to the eIDAS 2 regulation "Relying Parties shall be responsible for carrying out the procedure for authenticating and validating person identification data and electronic attestation of attributes requested from European Digital Identity Wallets". According to the ARF there are status list which will facilitate the validation. However these lists cannot be reached if RPs are offline, therefore in such transactions the technical conditions for validation are missing. The use of status lists does not comply with the legal requirements.
Alternative methods should be used which can better guarantee the validity and integrity of PIDs and attestations. A trust chain from provider through user to verifier would be a more suitable solution.