You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I spent a few hours vendoring folly into a codebase using tcmalloc the other day and ran into a few issues. I noticed reference to USE_TCMALLOC and FOLLY_ASSUME_NO_TCMALLOC but neither of those are set in any of the build files I looked at. Once actually compiling I ran into a number of issues with symbol redefinitions (nallocx, sdallocx and MallocExtension_Internal_GetNumericProperty) as well as missing symbols (mallctl and friends). Do y'all support building with tcmalloc? If not, would you accept patches to (re)introduce support? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I spent a few hours vendoring folly into a codebase using tcmalloc the other day and ran into a few issues. I noticed reference to USE_TCMALLOC and FOLLY_ASSUME_NO_TCMALLOC but neither of those are set in any of the build files I looked at. Once actually compiling I ran into a number of issues with symbol redefinitions (
nallocx
,sdallocx
andMallocExtension_Internal_GetNumericProperty
) as well as missing symbols (mallctl
and friends). Do y'all support building with tcmalloc? If not, would you accept patches to (re)introduce support? Thank you!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: