-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(jest-transform): refactor transformer API to reduce number of arguments #10834
Conversation
@@ -1,80 +1,98 @@ | |||
// Jest Snapshot v1, https://goo.gl/fbAQLP | |||
|
|||
exports[`ScriptTransformer passes expected transform options to getCacheKey 1`] = ` | |||
Object { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ignore whitespace: https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/10834/files?w=1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sweet! Would be lovely to add a CodeTransformations doc link to the "syntax error" detailed message, or change the generic documentation link to this one
"unmockedModulePathPatterns": undefined, | ||
"watchPathIgnorePatterns": Array [], | ||
}, | ||
"configString": "{\\"automock\\":false,\\"cache\\":true,\\"cacheDirectory\\":\\"/cache/\\",\\"clearMocks\\":false,\\"coveragePathIgnorePatterns\\":[],\\"cwd\\":\\"/test_root_dir/\\",\\"detectLeaks\\":false,\\"detectOpenHandles\\":false,\\"errorOnDeprecated\\":false,\\"extraGlobals\\":[],\\"forceCoverageMatch\\":[],\\"globals\\":{},\\"haste\\":{},\\"injectGlobals\\":true,\\"moduleDirectories\\":[],\\"moduleFileExtensions\\":[\\"js\\"],\\"moduleLoader\\":\\"/test_module_loader_path\\",\\"moduleNameMapper\\":[],\\"modulePathIgnorePatterns\\":[],\\"modulePaths\\":[],\\"name\\":\\"test\\",\\"prettierPath\\":\\"prettier\\",\\"resetMocks\\":false,\\"resetModules\\":false,\\"restoreMocks\\":false,\\"rootDir\\":\\"/\\",\\"roots\\":[],\\"runner\\":\\"jest-runner\\",\\"setupFiles\\":[],\\"setupFilesAfterEnv\\":[],\\"skipFilter\\":false,\\"skipNodeResolution\\":false,\\"slowTestThreshold\\":5,\\"snapshotSerializers\\":[],\\"testEnvironment\\":\\"node\\",\\"testEnvironmentOptions\\":{},\\"testLocationInResults\\":false,\\"testMatch\\":[],\\"testPathIgnorePatterns\\":[],\\"testRegex\\":[\\"\\\\\\\\.test\\\\\\\\.js$\\"],\\"testRunner\\":\\"jest-jasmine2\\",\\"testURL\\":\\"http://localhost\\",\\"timers\\":\\"real\\",\\"transform\\":[[\\"\\\\\\\\.js$\\",\\"test_preprocessor\\",{}]],\\"transformIgnorePatterns\\":[\\"/node_modules/\\"],\\"watchPathIgnorePatterns\\":[]}", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at this snapshot and thinking if we need to bust the transform cache when any of the configuration options change? Wouldn't it be sufficient to only reset cache when transform output affecting config is changed, like cache
, transform
, cacheDirectory
, extraGlobals
? Downside would be maintaining such a list
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Downside would be maintaining such a list
exactly this. Might be worth it, tho
8349594
to
afca168
Compare
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ | |||
}, | |||
"resolutions": { | |||
"@types/jest/jest-diff": "^25.1.0", | |||
"@types/jest/pretty-format": "^25.1.0" | |||
"@types/jest/pretty-format": "^25.1.0", | |||
"fbjs-scripts": "patch:fbjs-scripts@^1.1.0#./patches/fbjs-scripts.patch" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
which docs? |
Co-authored-by: Michał Pierzchała <thymikee@gmail.com>
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Summary
Sorta for #10823 (comment). While writing the docs the arguments jumped out to me, so decided to refactor the code.
Test plan
Existing tests should pass, tweaked others