-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
autoFocus doesn't work with SSR in React 16 #11159
Comments
I think we should emit autofocus as an attribute. It looks like the key drawback is that |
If we always do it in JS, it's pretty easy, but it seems pretty bad for semantics. It can take a while for all the scripts to load before it actually gets focused. The user can focus other things in the meantime and then suddenly it becomes focused. Since with Fiber we can asynchronously rehydrate and we might also want to do partial hydration it might make that even worse than it already is. We can do both but then you have weird artifacts where it might get focused, you switch off and then it gets focused again. We could potentially only do it in JS if the normal one fails, but not sure how to detect it and that could add a lot of code. |
I'm not sure what the right tradeoff is here given the browser support issue. |
I think this is a very strong case for emitting an attribute. It sounds like we can't guarantee correctness, even if we check Sorry if some of that is a rehash, but that'd be the argument I would make if someone filed an issue about it. |
Emitting attribute sounds like the right way to go. If I want autofocus to work on browsers that don't support it it seems most sane to add a script to end of body: <script>!function(el){el&&el.focus()}(document.querySelector('[autofocus]'))</script> Which I guess only causes issues if the HTML page is very large. I guess it could also check for activeElement (if none or body then focus) but that might be overkill. |
cc #3066 |
The initial reason for not emitting the autofocus-attribute was that browser implementations were widely inconsistent in how they treated it (some does not support, some only focus on page load, etc). Which IMHO means that anyone that is serious about autofocus had to apply it manually via JS anyway. However, I vaguely remember there now being mobile browsers that don't really listen to JS focus, but do honor autofocus to some extent. It's a mess, but there's some merit to just emitting the attribute, and if you feel strongly about it then you focus manually. You're given all the tools. |
I chatted with @trueadm about this and I think this sounds like a plausible way forward: React 16
React 17
Does this make sense? |
Browsers, at least not long ago, are inconsistent in how they interpret the autoFocus attribute as well. I know that e.g. FF would only honor it on pageload and totally ignore any that were dynamically inserted. But I haven't surveyed it in a long time now. Still, I think the approach is correct. |
After some basic investigation it looks like most modern browsers except Safari don’t respect It probably made sense for HTML documents, but in apps I would expect So we should probably keep the polyfill. |
It gets weirder. Chrome respects dynamically added elements with Firefox just doesn’t care about any dynamically added elements with And Safari always respects them. |
Fixed in #11192. |
<input autoFocus />
works on the client but not when hydrated.That's because this used to be implemented in JS as a special case but
hydrateInstance
doesn't cause a commit effect to be scheduled that can call.focus()
likefinalizeChildren
does.The question here is, should we even bother implementing this in JS anymore or should we just emit the
autofocus
attribute in SSR and let the browser take care of it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: