Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need an explanation of what binaries are required after a build #73

Open
axefrog opened this issue Jul 11, 2011 · 6 comments
Open

Need an explanation of what binaries are required after a build #73

axefrog opened this issue Jul 11, 2011 · 6 comments

Comments

@axefrog
Copy link

axefrog commented Jul 11, 2011

I just performed a build of the latest source code snapshot (.Net 4.0) and I'm a bit confused as to the relationship between the two main projects - IronJS vs IronJS.Runtime. Neither reference each other and both end up with multiple assemblies, but I know previous builds I've downloaded have provided a single IronJS assembly. It would be good if this information was in the wiki.

For what it's worth, I need an "Any CPU" build. It would be great if that could be included as an option, even though it's less efficient than the platform-specific builds. There are many instances where it's not straightforward to choose either the x64 or the x86 build.

@otac0n
Copy link
Collaborator

otac0n commented Jul 11, 2011

Ok, so first off, there is an Any CPU build. It is on the master branch and in NuGet. In fact, both versions that have been published to NuGet have been Any CPU.

Secondly, what do you mean that neither library references the other? IronJS references IronJS.Runtime.

Thirdly, we have a script in the "Package" folder that will automatically merge the assembiles together so that you can have the "single assembly" that you want.

@axefrog
Copy link
Author

axefrog commented Jul 11, 2011

I'm sorry, I was going off what was available in the "Downloads" popup. I'm guessing what's there is somewhat out of date. I didn't realise the assemblies needed to be merged.

@otac0n
Copy link
Collaborator

otac0n commented Jul 11, 2011

They don't need to be merged, but you can do so if you would like. We plan on pushing it out to NuGet that way.

@axefrog
Copy link
Author

axefrog commented Jul 11, 2011

Will you be updating the downloads in parallel? We don't use NuGet for our project, rather we have a dependencies folder where we dump binaries. NuGet is a little too helpful for us given the legacy nature of our project.

@otac0n
Copy link
Collaborator

otac0n commented Jul 12, 2011

Ok, I have put the most recent NuGet versions up on the downloads tab.

@axefrog
Copy link
Author

axefrog commented Jul 12, 2011

Great, thanks I'll check it out. I still recommend an update to your compile instructions in the wiki though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants