Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.

Using CommA instead of listing CommRs in PoSt #101

Closed
3 tasks
nicola opened this issue Mar 19, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
3 tasks

Using CommA instead of listing CommRs in PoSt #101

nicola opened this issue Mar 19, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@nicola
Labels
key-todo P1 Medium priority proofs sector-mgmt

Comments

@nicola
Copy link
Contributor

nicola commented Mar 19, 2019

Today PoSt takes as an input the list of sectors that the miner is proving.
We should:

  • Define how many sectors in a single PoSt can be proven (or at least an upperbound)
  • Determine if commA should be calculated by the full nodes or if there should be a proof proving that commA was calculated correctly
  • Determine a protocol to generate commA
@nicola nicola added the launch-critical Required for launch label Mar 19, 2019
@nicola nicola mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2019
Closed
@nicola nicola added proofs and removed proofs labels Apr 3, 2019
@nicola
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicola commented Jun 20, 2019

Note: since we have a way to aggregate SNARK proofs, @porcuquine and I figured out a simple way to get a large amount of sectors being proven in a PoSt (which also supports well Multi-Sector Size).

@nicola
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicola commented Aug 8, 2019

This is not needed with the current PoSt construction defined in filecoin-project/specs#332

@nicola nicola removed the launch-critical Required for launch label Aug 8, 2019
@nicola
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicola commented May 5, 2020

old issue, closing

@nicola nicola closed this as completed May 5, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@nicola nicola

Labels
key-todo P1 Medium priority proofs sector-mgmt
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@whyrusleeping @nicola