-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 659
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Dynamic workflows won't run with flytekit>=1.3.0
#3324
Comments
Speaking about the plan for this bug. We're reverting the offending change and getting a patch release of flytekit out (version 1.3.2). Members of the core team got together earlier today and the consensus is that we have a bug in the backend, more specifically the compiler, but while we work on a fix, we're mitigating this issue by the plan described ahead. We decided against yanking the versions 1.3.0 and 1.3.1 of flytekit because this bug only affects dynamic workflows. |
Just adding a breadcrumb, #3169 (comment) describes the rationale for the offending change. We'll be revisiting this in the next few days. |
@eapolinario do you know when the 1.3.2 patch will get propagated to the feedstock? |
@lindseynield , 1.3.2 change is happening in conda-forge/flytekit-feedstock#38 and should land in the next day or two. |
can we close this issue? or are we still waiting on something from conda? @bstadlbauer I re-patched in flyteorg/flytekit#1529 - mind taking a look? |
@lindseynield , flytekit 1.3.2 is in conda: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/flytekit |
Describe the bug
After upgrading to
flytekit>=1.3.0
, the following error message appears when workflows are run:Example workflow:
The workflow was serialized using
pyflyte -k <package> serialize --image <image> workflows -f <output_dir
.A bit of investigation lead to possibly flyteorg/flytekit#1378 being the root cause of this.
Expected behavior
The dynamic workflow should run
Additional context to reproduce
No response
Screenshots
No response
Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already?
Have you read the Code of Conduct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: