S3 bucket policy is timing out while waiting for "s3-full-access" become "success"

[devgnx]

S3 bucket policy is timing out while waiting for s3-full-access become success.
Maybe is related to:
hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#9414
hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#9435

Steps to reproduce

ᐅ cd ./examples/gitlab-simple-ha
ᐅ make generate-ssh-key
ᐅ make render-tfvars
ᐅ make network
ᐅ make plan
ᐅ make apply "tf.out"

module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Creating...
module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Still creating... [10s elapsed]
module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Still creating... [20s elapsed]
module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Still creating... [30s elapsed]
module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Still creating... [40s elapsed]
module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Still creating... [50s elapsed]
module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Still creating... [1m0s elapsed]
module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Still creating... [1m10s elapsed]
module.docker-registry-s3-storage.aws_s3_bucket_policy.s3-full-access: Still creating... [1m20s elapsed]

Error: Error putting S3 policy: timeout while waiting for state to become 'success' (timeout: 1m0s)

  on ../../modules/s3-remote-state/main.tf line 94, in resource "aws_s3_bucket_policy" "s3-full-access":
  94: resource "aws_s3_bucket_policy" "s3-full-access" {


Makefile:65: recipe for target 'apply' failed
make: *** [apply] Error 1

Version

Terraform v0.12.2
Terraform AWS Foundation branch 241-Missing-ASG-IAM-output-variables

[mcgirr]

@ketzacoatl is this potentially related to #286?

[mcgirr]

I think this will be resolved when #286 is resolved. I've run into something similar recently and setting the principals input on the s3-remote-state module resolved the issue for me.

[mcgirr]

@ketzacoatl I think this issue is good to close now that we've addressed #286 with #297

[mcgirr]

@devgnx can you please confirm if you're still encountering the same issue when using the module with the changes from #297? If you provide a non-empty list of principals I believe the issue you described will go away.

[mcgirr]

Closing this as resolved. Please re-open if needed.

CC @ketzacoatl

[ketzacoatl]

Looks great, thanks Mike!