Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to handle authentication #1

Open
christian-sahlmann opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 14 comments
Open

Unable to handle authentication #1

christian-sahlmann opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 14 comments

Comments

@christian-sahlmann
Copy link

% $GOPATH/bin/deckschrubber -registry $REGISTRY_URL
FATA[0000] Error while fetching repositories! (err: unauthorized: authentication required)
@yan-foto
Copy link
Member

It this a comment, a suggestion, or just an observation?

@christian-sahlmann
Copy link
Author

Sorry for the scarce information. I was in a hurry freeing up the disk space ;)

As this project is using the official libraries, I was expecting that it handles authentication the same way as a docker pull (using the information from .docker/config.json).

So if it should theoretically work as currently implemented, this is a bug report. If it's simply not implemented yet, this is a feature request. :)

Anyways, in the meantime i already solved my issue by accessing the registry directly with my own custom script via the API, and cleaning the orphaned blobs afterwards with registry garbage-collect. So you can also see this information just as a comment and close the issue.

@yan-foto
Copy link
Member

Got it! Maybe I should enhance the documentation. But the short answer is: no it doesn't read from config.json. You should just change your URL to contain HTTP basic auth credentials. But this would be a really nice feature 👍

@yan-foto
Copy link
Member

Would you be able to test the new feature branch (not uploaded yet) that enables basic auth? If yes, I'll upload the branch. Thanks.

@gerritjanf
Copy link

Hi! I am running into this issue as well, can you upload the branch so i can test it?

@yan-foto
Copy link
Member

@gerritjanf great! I only have implemented the basic auth and not the token based. Please give me some time, as I am fairly busy ATM.

@gerritjanf
Copy link

@yan-foto Okay. Basic auth is fine with me

@yan-foto
Copy link
Member

yan-foto commented Feb 1, 2018

Here is the branch: https://github.com/fraunhoferfokus/deckschrubber/tree/feature/basic-auth

Please note that it has been a while since I tested the code and it might be buggy.

I really appreciate your commitment! 👍

@gerritjanf
Copy link

@yan-foto The -username and -password options seem to be missing from the code in the branch you refference.

@yan-foto
Copy link
Member

yan-foto commented Feb 3, 2018

@gerritjanf sorry for wasting your time! The commit was missing :( I pushed again just now.

@gerritjanf
Copy link

gerritjanf commented Feb 5, 2018

Hi @yan-foto, Just tried again and now i have the basic auth parameters. However it seems that it doesn't work for me. I am tying to use your tool against the registry included in GitLab omnibus and it is complaining about using a token. As this is not yet implemented i seems that your tool is not usable for me right now.

@yan-foto
Copy link
Member

yan-foto commented Feb 5, 2018

Yes I know! They don't use basic auth.

@yan-foto
Copy link
Member

For anyone who is interested (cc @phertweck @mf-lit @phlegx), I have provided a shaky implementation for token-based authentication under basic-auth feature branch. As I don't use Docker anymore and have no proper way of testing this, it would be great if any of you guys cold give it a try. It still works with basic auth and should now support the rest.

NOTE: I am not familiar with scoping mechanisms of Docker Registry and don't know if you could even catalog a registry (to list repositories) if you're not the owner; I also don't know if that process can be limited to namespaces, etc. Accordingly, I'm not sure if this program could be used with registries that you don't own (e.g., Docker Hub).

I appreciate any help!

@davidrot
Copy link

davidrot commented Jan 1, 2022

@yan-foto FYI I have tested https://github.com/fraunhoferfokus/deckschrubber/releases/tag/v0.6.0 against a traefik basic auth to a private registry and it was working like a charm :) Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants