Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add logic to identify Case Query Advanced page #321

Closed
ERosendo opened this issue Dec 19, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by freelawproject/recap-chrome#294
Closed

Add logic to identify Case Query Advanced page #321

ERosendo opened this issue Dec 19, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by freelawproject/recap-chrome#294
Assignees

Comments

@ERosendo
Copy link

The current implementation of the extension is uploading CaseQueryAdvanced pages using the upload_type created for CaseQuery pages ( UPLOAD_TYPE=12 ), so Juriscraper is not able to parse( This issue is described in Juriscraper #598).

Here's a screenshot of this page from the district and bankruptcy court:

District Court bankruptcy court
image image

The extension should use the new upload_type described in freelawproject/juriscraper#598 (comment) so we can avoid the Juriscraper error.

@ERosendo ERosendo self-assigned this Dec 19, 2022
@mlissner
Copy link
Member

If we bother with district court (which wasn't a problem before, I think?) then we should do it as a separate upload type than appellate (as we do with all the other upload types).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants