Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fully migrate to poetry #289

Closed
carmenbianca opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by #509 or #600
Closed

Fully migrate to poetry #289

carmenbianca opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by #509 or #600
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@carmenbianca
Copy link
Member

This should more permanently deal with problems such as #288.

Super low priority.

@carmenbianca carmenbianca added enhancement New feature or request priority/low Low priority labels Dec 17, 2020
@sjha2048
Copy link

Hey @carmenbianca , I was trying to work on this and was able to migrate to pipenv.
I had some questions regarding the same, I was also trying to change the build process in Dockerfile and my question is why create a venv inside a container when Docker achieves the same thing? with pipfile Dockerfile was reduced to a couple of lines.
My other question was, makefile also needs be modified for using pipfile?
Shall I open a PR for the same?

@carmenbianca
Copy link
Member Author

Hey @sjha2048

why create a venv inside a container

I don't think there's actually a good reason for this. Habit? Not sure.

makefile also needs be modified for using pipfile?

Probably yes.

Shall I open a PR for the same?

If you want!


I did a little bit of research (not a whole lot!) into this a while ago. I'm not actually sure what the best approach is. Poetry gets rid of setup.py, which is a little annoying because we currently do some custom stuff in there. The consensus on pipenv appears to be that it's being superceded by Poetry, and that it subtly breaks a lot between updates. The latter matches my experience from when I tried it when pipenv was still relatively new.

@mxmehl
Copy link
Member

mxmehl commented Feb 4, 2021

Just throwing in the note that setup.py is used for the AUR package of reuse: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=reuse

Not sure whether poetry would be supported in this fashion.

@carmenbianca
Copy link
Member Author

Poetry has an equivalent to python setup.py install in poetry install, I think. I'm not sure how distro packagers normally deal with Poetry stuff, however, so this would be important to keep in mind.

The same needs to be kept in mind for pipenv, I guess. The pipenv-less workflow of using a bare setup.py would still need to be tested/maintained.

An alternative way of fixing #288-like problems is freezing the entire dependency tree in requirements.txt and requirements-dev.txt. Not sure how to cleanly separate the runtime dependency tree from the development dependency tree, though. And not sure how to stay on top of updates (although, admittedly, this is currently also a bump-everything-every-once-in-a-while affair).

@sjha2048
Copy link

sjha2048 commented Feb 5, 2021

Thank you for your insights, @carmenbianca & @mxmehl, I'll dig up a little more about this and get back to you If required.

@linozen
Copy link
Contributor

linozen commented Apr 6, 2022

Just throwing in the note that setup.py is used for the AUR package of reuse: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=reuse

Not sure whether poetry would be supported in this fashion.

poetry build creates a release file, e.g. reuse-0.14.0.tar.gz that contains a setup.py file:

/home/lino/Source/github.com/reuse-tool/dist
├── reuse-0.14.0
│   ├── LICENSES
│   ├── PKG-INFO
│   ├── pyproject.toml
│   ├── setup.py
│   └── src
│       └── reuse
│           ├── _comment.py
│           ├── download.py
│           ├── _format.py
│           ├── header.py
│           ├── __init__.py
│           ├── init.py
│           ├── _licenses.py
│           ├── lint.py
│           ├── __main__.py
│           ├── _main.py
│           ├── project.py
│           ├── report.py
│           ├── resources
│           │   ├── exceptions.json
│           │   ├── exceptions.json.license
│           │   ├── licenses.json
│           │   └── licenses.json.license
│           ├── spdx.py
│           ├── supported_licenses.py
│           ├── templates
│           │   ├── default_template.jinja2
│           │   └── default_template.jinja2.license
│           ├── _util.py
│           └── vcs.py
├── reuse-0.14.0-py3-none-any.whl
└── reuse-0.14.0.tar.gz

@mxmehl mxmehl added this to the v1.0.0 milestone May 6, 2022
@linozen linozen changed the title Switch to poetry or pipenv Fully migrate to poetry May 9, 2022
@linozen
Copy link
Contributor

linozen commented May 9, 2022

What is missing to complete (fore more info, see this initial PR) our migration to poetry is:

  • Basic usage should be documented. CONTRIBUTING.md is probably a good destination for this. As a matter of fact, there's some stuff in the README that should probably be moved to that destination, but we can delay that.
  • Translations aren't included in the built package. One can use custom build scripts in poetry but it is an undocumented feature as of now. See this issue for more info.
  • The long description is not included in the built package.
  • The license files are not included in the built package.

@linozen linozen reopened this May 9, 2022
@linozen linozen removed the priority/low Low priority label May 9, 2022
@carmenbianca carmenbianca modified the milestones: v1.0.0, Backlog May 12, 2022
@carmenbianca carmenbianca mentioned this issue Oct 8, 2022
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
4 participants