Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 16, 2020. It is now read-only.

Include DeepL Translator #322

Open
ohager opened this issue Dec 28, 2019 · 8 comments
Open

Include DeepL Translator #322

ohager opened this issue Dec 28, 2019 · 8 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ohager
Copy link

ohager commented Dec 28, 2019

Would be nice, if the DeepL Translator API could be integrated. The translation quality of DeepL outperforms Google Translate.

https://www.deepl.com/docs-api.html

@gilmarsquinelato
Copy link
Owner

Hey @ohager,

Indeed DeepL sounds to be way better,
Right now I'm developing the v3 of i18n Manager, and this release have some big implementations, maybe this feature can be put in the v3.1 :)

@Androz2091
Copy link

It would be very very nice!

@gilmarsquinelato gilmarsquinelato added this to the 3.1.0 milestone Apr 17, 2020
@daniol
Copy link

daniol commented May 26, 2020

The Translate API of Yandex produces very good results for most language sets, it is also free up to 1.000.000 chars per day and uses a very easy syntax.

Info: https://tech.yandex.com/translate/
API reference: https://tech.yandex.com/translate/doc/dg/reference/translate-docpage/

@Androz2091
Copy link

I'm not sure the quality of Yandex Translate API is the same as the quality of DeepL...

@gilmarsquinelato
Copy link
Owner

Indeed, I don't know it Yandex one is good enough to be used now, it doesn't even put the customers using it.

@daniol
Copy link

daniol commented May 26, 2020

I just used Yandex last week to translate about 400 strings of a website and it worked well for spanish, catalan and german.

@gilmarsquinelato
Copy link
Owner

Cool, but we don't have more use cases/companies using it.
This is because we don't know how long it is at the market, breaking changes, etc.

@gilmarsquinelato
Copy link
Owner

At the other hand, we have DeepL, that seems to be longer in the market.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants