fix #2762 #2767

qm012 · 2021-06-27T12:43:42Z

content

handle level 1 router match
It does not affect the matching of the following routes
level1 router match Will cause params to fail

file: tree.test
line: 198 199
new PR handle

qm012 · 2021-06-27T12:45:07Z

Detailed content： #2762

qm012 · 2021-06-27T13:25:31Z

@appleboy @rw-access Would you please take a look when you are free? Very thx. 😃

rw-access

can you add some more comments and/or an explanation of how this works? it's not clear what's going on and that makes it hard to review

tree.go

.gitignore

appleboy · 2021-06-28T04:26:03Z

Please also add benchmark result like #2706 (comment) comment.

qm012 · 2021-06-28T11:53:54Z

Please also add benchmark result like #2706 (comment) comment.

hi，local 'go test --run TestTreeWildcard/TestRunDynamicRouting' passed and add benchmark if there are omissions, please help me to add. 😆

The previous code could not match when running 'benchmark', and 404 not found occurred,Previously, the matching of 'level 1 router' was unreliable, so the matching method was changed😆

The benchmarks:

this PR - https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231071258

Thank you all for your reviews.

appleboy · 2021-06-29T04:39:07Z

@qm012 Please provide the benchmark between master and PR and show the result of benchstat command.

qm012 · 2021-06-29T06:31:37Z

The benchmarks:

master https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231184203
this PR https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231184328

appleboy · 2021-06-29T06:47:00Z

@qm012 I make the PR https://github.com/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/pull/1/files to change the go version and update the testing count. Please update the new result by benchstat tool below.

$ benchstat old.txt new.txt
name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
Gin_Param           72.0ns ± 0%    73.4ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_Param5           122ns ± 0%     146ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_Param20          320ns ± 0%     432ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_ParamWrite       127ns ± 0%     130ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_GithubStatic    91.2ns ± 0%   130.0ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_GithubParam      160ns ± 0%     238ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_GithubAll       31.9µs ± 0%    48.1µs ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_GPlusStatic     65.4ns ± 0%    95.3ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_GPlusParam      93.7ns ± 0%   137.0ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_GPlus2Params     119ns ± 0%     153ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_GPlusAll        1.29µs ± 0%    1.73µs ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_ParseStatic     66.0ns ± 0%    85.2ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_ParseParam      75.8ns ± 0%    86.4ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_Parse2Params    87.5ns ± 0%   103.0ns ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_ParseAll        2.23µs ± 0%    2.92µs ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Gin_StaticAll       24.1µs ± 0%    36.2µs ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=1+1)

qm012 · 2021-06-29T08:39:43Z

hi, @appleboy Thanks you for reminding me.
The benchmarks:

master https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231194542
this PR https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231194421

The benchstat report:

$ benchstat old.txt new.txt
name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
Gin_Param           91.1ns ± 2%   119.2ns ± 4%  +30.92%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_Param5           163ns ± 2%     253ns ± 3%  +54.70%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Gin_Param20          399ns ± 2%     712ns ± 8%  +78.57%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Gin_ParamWrite       174ns ± 1%     219ns ± 5%  +26.21%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_GithubStatic     129ns ± 1%     223ns ± 1%  +72.08%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Gin_GithubParam      229ns ± 2%     429ns ± 2%  +87.68%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_GithubAll       42.8µs ± 2%    73.0µs ± 2%  +70.56%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Gin_GPlusStatic     91.5ns ± 2%   147.0ns ± 2%  +60.60%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_GPlusParam       137ns ± 2%     209ns ± 1%  +53.05%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Gin_GPlus2Params     180ns ± 1%     286ns ± 2%  +59.00%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Gin_GPlusAll        1.82µs ± 2%    2.86µs ± 1%  +57.30%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseStatic     99.3ns ± 3%   146.9ns ± 4%  +47.92%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseParam       106ns ± 1%     143ns ± 1%  +35.59%  (p=0.000 n=9+8)
Gin_Parse2Params     127ns ± 2%     183ns ± 3%  +43.87%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseAll        3.15µs ± 2%    4.90µs ± 2%  +55.56%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_StaticAll       31.6µs ± 1%    59.4µs ± 2%  +87.94%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)

qm012 · 2021-06-29T12:36:35Z

Benchstat report of the newly submitted Code:

$ benchstat old.txt new.txt
name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
Gin_Param           93.5ns ± 5%    99.5ns ± 0%   +6.49%  (p=0.000 n=10+7)
Gin_Param5           166ns ± 2%     216ns ± 1%  +30.03%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_Param20          407ns ± 2%     612ns ± 1%  +50.42%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_ParamWrite       177ns ± 2%     187ns ± 2%   +5.51%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Gin_GithubStatic     135ns ± 1%     193ns ± 2%  +43.04%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Gin_GithubParam      236ns ± 5%     367ns ± 1%  +55.40%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_GithubAll       43.8µs ± 2%    62.1µs ± 3%  +41.81%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_GPlusStatic     93.9ns ± 3%   123.6ns ± 2%  +31.58%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Gin_GPlusParam       139ns ± 1%     184ns ± 2%  +31.82%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Gin_GPlus2Params     183ns ± 1%     246ns ± 2%  +34.41%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Gin_GPlusAll        1.84µs ± 2%    2.49µs ± 2%  +35.36%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_ParseStatic     93.2ns ± 1%   131.3ns ± 1%  +40.90%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_ParseParam       108ns ± 2%     129ns ± 1%  +20.13%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Gin_Parse2Params     133ns ± 3%     160ns ± 1%  +20.37%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Gin_ParseAll        3.11µs ± 1%    4.32µs ± 2%  +38.70%  (p=0.000 n=8+10)
Gin_StaticAll       32.3µs ± 2%    51.2µs ± 1%  +58.16%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

I will continue to optimize the report, but the current result is not very ideal
Root: Search the route tree for secondary route matching rules

// match '/', If this condition is matched, the next route is found
if strings.HasSuffix(n.path, "/") || strings.Contains(n.fullPath, ":") || n.path == "" {
	matchNum++
}

Thank you all for your reviews.😆

qm012 · 2021-06-30T02:41:48Z

The benchmarks:
master https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231194542
this PR https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231313687

The benchstat report:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
Gin_Param           62.5ns ± 4%    64.0ns ± 5%     ~     (p=0.110 n=10+10)
Gin_Param5           110ns ± 3%     114ns ± 5%   +3.31%  (p=0.017 n=10+10)
Gin_Param20          276ns ± 2%     298ns ± 3%   +7.92%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParamWrite       118ns ± 2%     120ns ± 5%     ~     (p=0.136 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubStatic    78.3ns ± 2%    96.4ns ± 2%  +23.07%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubParam      129ns ± 0%     177ns ± 2%  +37.55%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubAll       25.5µs ± 0%    32.1µs ± 1%  +26.01%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusStatic     62.7ns ± 0%    69.5ns ± 2%  +10.90%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusParam      88.6ns ± 3%   105.4ns ± 2%  +18.98%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlus2Params     112ns ± 2%     138ns ± 1%  +23.81%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusAll        1.14µs ± 1%    1.38µs ± 1%  +20.95%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_ParseStatic     59.2ns ± 0%    67.1ns ± 2%  +13.25%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseParam      70.6ns ± 4%    75.7ns ± 2%   +7.22%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_Parse2Params    83.3ns ± 1%    90.8ns ± 1%   +8.95%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Gin_ParseAll        1.97µs ± 1%    2.27µs ± 1%  +15.50%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_StaticAll       18.6µs ± 0%    25.0µs ± 1%  +34.31%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

add more comments update comment add example fix benchmark not found add comment and update test method gin_integration_test.go#L407 update comment and lastedNode directly assign current node optimize code Optimize the search next router logic optimize code Adjust the matching rules Adjust the matching order update condition code

qm012 · 2021-07-01T05:31:53Z

hi @appleboy I updated the code, and when looking for the contents of the test report, I found that the relevant code submitted with (#2706) maintained two nodes, which would cause the test report to fail to get the expected results, so I made changes and optimizations. By maintaining a node, I controlled the way to find nodes, and made several cross-test reports for comparison when judging test conditions, and got an acceptable final result. Thank you for your help and review.

The benchmarks:

branch	benchmark	running time
`master`	https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231451724	634.111s
`this PR`	https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231449191	633.627s

The benchstat report:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
Gin_Param           63.5ns ± 4%    62.6ns ± 4%    ~     (p=0.448 n=10+10)
Gin_Param5           112ns ± 6%     114ns ± 3%    ~     (p=0.109 n=10+10)
Gin_Param20          282ns ± 3%     297ns ± 1%  +5.47%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParamWrite       119ns ± 5%     118ns ± 2%    ~     (p=0.566 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubStatic    81.2ns ± 6%    79.3ns ± 0%    ~     (p=0.085 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubParam      128ns ± 6%     132ns ± 1%  +2.64%  (p=0.006 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubAll       26.2µs ± 3%    27.1µs ± 1%  +3.10%  (p=0.004 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusStatic     66.0ns ± 3%    63.3ns ± 2%  -4.17%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusParam      91.2ns ± 3%    86.1ns ± 1%  -5.62%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlus2Params     117ns ± 5%     110ns ± 1%  -6.32%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Gin_GPlusAll        1.23µs ± 7%    1.22µs ± 0%    ~     (p=1.000 n=10+8)
Gin_ParseStatic     62.4ns ± 5%    61.9ns ± 1%    ~     (p=0.218 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseParam      70.2ns ± 6%    68.3ns ± 1%    ~     (p=0.184 n=10+10)
Gin_Parse2Params    82.5ns ± 4%    83.7ns ± 1%  +1.49%  (p=0.014 n=10+9)
Gin_ParseAll        2.01µs ± 3%    2.05µs ± 2%    ~     (p=0.287 n=10+10)
Gin_StaticAll       18.9µs ± 3%    19.4µs ± 1%  +2.93%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

appleboy · 2021-07-01T08:23:27Z

@g1eny0ung Please also take look at it. #2767 (comment)

g1eny0ung · 2021-07-01T09:27:39Z

@g1eny0ung Please also take look at it. #2767 (comment)

I'll take a look these few days. Sorry because I'm a little busy this week. 😵

qm012 · 2021-07-02T07:03:07Z

hi @appleboy After a lot of cross-testing and comparison, the latest feedback test report is very exciting.I also tried to match '/' in another way, but the final result was not satisfactory.
source code
benchmark

The latest benchmarks:

branch	benchmark	running time
`master`	https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231451724	634.111s
`this PR`	https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231589953	631.022s

The latest benchstat report:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
Gin_Param           63.5ns ± 4%    60.6ns ± 1%   -4.54%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_Param5           112ns ± 6%     103ns ± 1%   -7.63%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_Param20          282ns ± 3%     259ns ± 3%   -7.91%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParamWrite       119ns ± 5%     117ns ± 3%     ~     (p=0.160 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubStatic    81.2ns ± 6%    71.9ns ± 2%  -11.36%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubParam      128ns ± 6%     119ns ± 1%   -7.16%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubAll       26.2µs ± 3%    25.3µs ± 1%   -3.41%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusStatic     66.0ns ± 3%    58.2ns ± 2%  -11.86%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusParam      91.2ns ± 3%    76.0ns ± 2%  -16.70%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Gin_GPlus2Params     117ns ± 5%      95ns ± 1%  -19.17%  (p=0.000 n=9+8)
Gin_GPlusAll        1.23µs ± 7%    1.09µs ± 2%  -11.36%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseStatic     62.4ns ± 5%    62.0ns ± 2%     ~     (p=0.280 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseParam      70.2ns ± 6%    69.0ns ± 4%     ~     (p=0.218 n=10+10)
Gin_Parse2Params    82.5ns ± 4%    83.0ns ± 2%     ~     (p=0.271 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseAll        2.01µs ± 3%    1.94µs ± 2%   -3.86%  (p=0.008 n=10+10)
Gin_StaticAll       18.9µs ± 3%    18.4µs ± 1%   -2.59%  (p=0.005 n=10+10)

tree_test.go

tree.go

.gitignore

appleboy · 2021-07-06T01:04:47Z

Gin_Param5           112ns ± 6%     119ns ± 4%   +6.74%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_Param20          282ns ± 3%     310ns ± 2%  +10.09%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

@rw-access @g1eny0ung any suggestion about this?

qm012 · 2021-07-06T09:28:57Z

hi @appleboy @rw-access @thinkerou I updated the code

The latest benchmarks:

branch	benchmark	running time
`master`	https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231451724	634.111s
`this PR`	https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231897300	634.952s

The latest benchstat report:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
Gin_Param           63.5ns ± 4%    61.3ns ± 1%  -3.52%  (p=0.001 n=10+10)
Gin_Param5           112ns ± 6%     116ns ± 1%  +4.02%  (p=0.002 n=10+9)
Gin_Param20          282ns ± 3%     305ns ± 1%  +8.33%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_ParamWrite       119ns ± 5%     116ns ± 2%  -2.97%  (p=0.015 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubStatic    81.2ns ± 6%    80.3ns ± 0%    ~     (p=0.172 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubParam      128ns ± 6%     136ns ± 1%  +6.49%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubAll       26.2µs ± 3%    28.1µs ± 0%  +7.26%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusStatic     66.0ns ± 3%    61.4ns ± 0%  -6.93%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusParam      91.2ns ± 3%    83.3ns ± 0%  -8.65%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlus2Params     117ns ± 5%     108ns ± 0%  -8.00%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Gin_GPlusAll        1.23µs ± 7%    1.19µs ± 0%    ~     (p=0.464 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseStatic     62.4ns ± 5%    60.7ns ± 1%  -2.75%  (p=0.002 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseParam      70.2ns ± 6%    68.0ns ± 0%  -3.08%  (p=0.002 n=10+9)
Gin_Parse2Params    82.5ns ± 4%    85.8ns ± 0%  +4.11%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Gin_ParseAll        2.01µs ± 3%    1.99µs ± 0%    ~     (p=0.466 n=10+10)

qm012 · 2021-07-08T03:03:13Z

hi erveryone,more balanced test reporting

The latest benchmarks:

branch	benchmark	running time
`master`	https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/231451724	634.111s
`this PR`	https://travis-ci.com/github/qm012/go-http-routing-benchmark/builds/232107973	633.919s

The latest benchstat report:

name              old time/op    new time/op    delta
Gin_Param           63.5ns ± 4%    61.4ns ± 5%  -3.31%  (p=0.019 n=10+10)
Gin_Param5           112ns ± 6%     115ns ± 3%  +2.95%  (p=0.012 n=10+10)
Gin_Param20          282ns ± 3%     304ns ± 2%  +7.79%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_ParamWrite       119ns ± 5%     117ns ± 3%    ~     (p=0.102 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubStatic    81.2ns ± 6%    78.4ns ± 2%  -3.44%  (p=0.009 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubParam      128ns ± 6%     133ns ± 1%  +3.73%  (p=0.001 n=10+10)
Gin_GithubAll       26.2µs ± 3%    27.1µs ± 0%  +3.31%  (p=0.004 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusStatic     66.0ns ± 3%    62.7ns ± 2%  -5.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlusParam      91.2ns ± 3%    91.4ns ± 2%    ~     (p=0.796 n=10+10)
Gin_GPlus2Params     117ns ± 5%     117ns ± 1%    ~     (p=1.000 n=9+10)
Gin_GPlusAll        1.23µs ± 7%    1.19µs ± 1%    ~     (p=0.565 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseStatic     62.4ns ± 5%    59.9ns ± 1%  -3.92%  (p=0.001 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseParam      70.2ns ± 6%    68.1ns ± 1%  -2.88%  (p=0.023 n=10+10)
Gin_Parse2Params    82.5ns ± 4%    83.8ns ± 1%    ~     (p=0.089 n=10+10)
Gin_ParseAll        2.01µs ± 3%    1.96µs ± 1%  -2.91%  (p=0.003 n=10+10)
Gin_StaticAll       18.9µs ± 3%    19.1µs ± 0%    ~     (p=0.156 n=10+9)

appleboy · 2021-07-08T05:58:58Z

LGTM, need @g1eny0ung @thinkerou @rw-access review and confirm.

thinkerou

lgtm

thinkerou · 2021-07-13T23:55:30Z

maybe we can bump the new version v1.7.3 after merge this PR.

cc @thinkerou

merge and bump v1.7.3? thanks! @appleboy

appleboy · 2021-07-23T04:09:50Z

@thinkerou we can't release the v1.7.3 version since of the issue #2786

@qm012 I can reproduce the issue with the latest commit d4ca9a0

package main

import (
	"fmt"

	"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)

func handler01(c *gin.Context) {
	fmt.Println(c.Params)
	c.String(200, "ok01")
}

func handler02(c *gin.Context) {
	fmt.Println(c.Params)
	c.String(200, "ok02")
}

func main() {
	g := gin.Default()
	g.GET("/get/abc", handler01)
	g.GET("/get/:param", handler02)
	g.Run(":9090")
}

result:

/abc  200 ok02
/a    404
/ab   200 ok02
/xyz  200 ok02
/abcd 200 ok02

sdojjy · 2021-09-13T06:48:48Z

package main

import "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"

func main() {
	r := gin.Default()

	r.GET("/aa/:customer", newHandler("/aa/:customer"))
	r.GET("/aa/:customer/files/:file", newHandler("/aa/:customer/files/:file"))

	r.Run() // listen and serve on 0.0.0.0:8080
}

func newHandler(t string) func(c *gin.Context) {
	return func(c *gin.Context) {
		c.JSON(200, gin.H{
			"message": t,
		})
	}
}

@qm012 @appleboy
For the above code example, the request results are:

/aa/1/files/aa  => /aa/:customer/files/:file
/aa/1/files/    =>  /aa/:customer
/aa/1/files    =>  404
/aa/1           =>  /aa/:customer

Is it by design?

qm012 · 2021-09-13T07:01:00Z

@sdojjy No, the test cases have not been fully covered. Thank you for your feedback.

jjba23 · 2021-09-27T11:51:49Z

this brought problems thus I am now frozen at #2878

(cherry picked from commit d4ca9a0)

rw-access reviewed Jun 27, 2021

View reviewed changes

tree.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

appleboy requested changes Jun 27, 2021

View reviewed changes

.gitignore Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

appleboy requested review from appleboy and thinkerou June 27, 2021 14:40

appleboy added the bug label Jun 27, 2021

appleboy added this to the v1.8 milestone Jun 27, 2021

qm012 force-pushed the develop-2762 branch from 4e8e2cb to b04bf36 Compare June 29, 2021 06:11

qm012 force-pushed the develop-2762 branch from 463b611 to 3fc08c9 Compare July 1, 2021 01:30

qm012 added 2 commits July 2, 2021 11:26

update match rules

0c0a50e

revert and update rules

211a634

rw-access reviewed Jul 2, 2021

View reviewed changes

tree_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved

rw-access reviewed Jul 2, 2021

View reviewed changes

tree.go Show resolved Hide resolved

rw-access reviewed Jul 2, 2021

View reviewed changes

.gitignore Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

qm012 added 2 commits July 3, 2021 20:21

reset .gitignore

9ec1d25

add more test and fix multiple params error

dfbc051

update description

82f3c92

qm012 added 2 commits July 6, 2021 15:13

update value.tsr match rule

085b582

update value.tsr match rule

a3ee271

update if condition

2d657d4

thinkerou approved these changes Jul 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

appleboy approved these changes Jul 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

appleboy merged commit d4ca9a0 into gin-gonic:master Jul 22, 2021

qm012 deleted the develop-2762 branch July 26, 2021 07:34

appleboy modified the milestones: v1.8, v1.7.3 Aug 3, 2021

appleboy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2021

fix #2762 (#2767)

9bc4d8c

This was referenced Aug 25, 2021

Fix the path params slice out of range with the wrong latest node #2820

Closed

fix the misplacement of adding slashes #2847

Merged

ibraheemdev mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2021

Bug with mixed static and dynamic params #2894

Closed

rbee3u mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2021

There are still some bugs about router #2900

Closed

ibraheemdev mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2021

Incorrect TSR with mixed static and wildcard paths #2918

Closed

Bisstocuz pushed a commit to Bisstocuz/gin that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2021

fix gin-gonic#2762 (gin-gonic#2767)

1e6d649

(cherry picked from commit d4ca9a0)

Bisstocuz pushed a commit to Bisstocuz/gin that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2021

fix gin-gonic#2762 (gin-gonic#2767)

b86d312

(cherry picked from commit d4ca9a0)

thinkerou pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2021

fix #2762 (#2767)

0f728f9

Bisstocuz mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2021

chore(docs): Bump to v1.7.7 #2952

Merged

daheige pushed a commit to daheige/gin that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2022

fix gin-gonic#2762 (gin-gonic#2767)

830e1b4

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fix #2762 #2767

fix #2762 #2767

qm012 commented Jun 27, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 27, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 27, 2021

rw-access left a comment

appleboy commented Jun 28, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 28, 2021 •

edited

Loading

appleboy commented Jun 29, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 29, 2021 •

edited

Loading

appleboy commented Jun 29, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 29, 2021 •

edited

Loading

qm012 commented Jun 29, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 30, 2021

qm012 commented Jul 1, 2021

appleboy commented Jul 1, 2021

g1eny0ung commented Jul 1, 2021

qm012 commented Jul 2, 2021

appleboy commented Jul 6, 2021

qm012 commented Jul 6, 2021

qm012 commented Jul 8, 2021

appleboy commented Jul 8, 2021

thinkerou left a comment

thinkerou commented Jul 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading

appleboy commented Jul 23, 2021

sdojjy commented Sep 13, 2021

qm012 commented Sep 13, 2021

jjba23 commented Sep 27, 2021

fix #2762 #2767

fix #2762 #2767

Conversation

qm012 commented Jun 27, 2021

content

qm012 commented Jun 27, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 27, 2021

rw-access left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

appleboy commented Jun 28, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 28, 2021 • edited Loading

appleboy commented Jun 29, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 29, 2021 • edited Loading

appleboy commented Jun 29, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 29, 2021 • edited Loading

qm012 commented Jun 29, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 30, 2021

qm012 commented Jul 1, 2021

appleboy commented Jul 1, 2021

g1eny0ung commented Jul 1, 2021

qm012 commented Jul 2, 2021

appleboy commented Jul 6, 2021

qm012 commented Jul 6, 2021

qm012 commented Jul 8, 2021

appleboy commented Jul 8, 2021

thinkerou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thinkerou commented Jul 13, 2021 • edited Loading

appleboy commented Jul 23, 2021

sdojjy commented Sep 13, 2021

qm012 commented Sep 13, 2021

jjba23 commented Sep 27, 2021

qm012 commented Jun 28, 2021 •

edited

Loading

qm012 commented Jun 29, 2021 •

edited

Loading

qm012 commented Jun 29, 2021 •

edited

Loading

thinkerou commented Jul 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading