Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve / Fix Example Code in README #469

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2018
Merged

Improve / Fix Example Code in README #469

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2018

Conversation

nkuehn
Copy link
Contributor

@nkuehn nkuehn commented Mar 20, 2018

While trying out I found that the example code for a custom check in the README does not actually run. It's mainly a word order typo.

I added the check for nil to the oktopost example, too because it's suspectible to the same issues - but that's optional and could be left out for conciseness sake.

If you want you can take over the .gitignore addition for JetBrains RubyMine IDE users, too. But that's just cosmetics.

@nkuehn nkuehn requested a review from Floppy as a code owner March 20, 2018 20:41
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 20, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #469 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #469   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.25%   98.25%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        1775     1775           
=======================================
  Hits         1744     1744           
  Misses         31       31

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 96d4fab...1d04301. Read the comment docs.

@gjtorikian
Copy link
Owner

Great, thank you!

@gjtorikian gjtorikian merged commit d9f29a6 into gjtorikian:master Mar 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants