You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a common request for biased tracers of the matter field using the same alm with differently-scaled gls.
This could be implemented if generate_gaussian() accepted either
a sequence of gls, or
gls with a leading axis.
The former option is potentially easier for users to provide, since those would be generated simply by calling e.g. lognormal_gls() multiple times with different inputs.
I think that changing to add the bias prior to generating the alms, aka by rescaling the cls, we lose the ability to generate multiple tracers with different biases and the same underlying matter density field. But maybe I don't quite understand what is being proposed.
The proposal is to generate the matter field as normal, but add functions to easily imprint a new (e.g. biased) angular power spectrum on the same alms. This isn't really a good bias model, but can be useful in some exceptional cases. See the proposed example for the application.
There is a common request for biased tracers of the matter field using the same
alm
with differently-scaledgls
.This could be implemented if
generate_gaussian()
accepted eithergls
, orgls
with a leading axis.The former option is potentially easier for users to provide, since those would be generated simply by calling e.g.
lognormal_gls()
multiple times with different inputs.CC: @hangqianjun
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: