-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
4th axis for grbl Mega #21
base: edge
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
any news about 4th axis implementation? |
You can watch ici |
Is there any plan for a merge of this? Let me add that I imagine chemnit to be a quite busy individual. I am not trying to push any work. Just wondering. Will definetely give this a try. Thanks for all the work on both grbl and this 4th. axis implementation! |
Hello, I'm try find a grbl with 4 axis to mod my mpcnc. |
@jflapao Hi, |
@fra589 Hello, |
@jflapao Hi, |
Hello,
I'm currently in the process of building a 4th axis for my OX CNC, and I needed to have a cheap controller for it.
I've being using grbl for about a year now, so that seemed the easiest way.
I quickly tested grbl-Mega, it worked for 3 axis, then I found an old grbl port for 6 axis, and I adapted it on grbl-Mega.
On the sender part, I also adapted bCNC to handle the A axis (control & DRO by now). You can check my repo, I guess it's the easiest way to test this pull request.
I have one question though, in the last commit I've extended the ijk array to match the size of xyz, because it's used as a temporary storage for XYZ (and A...) but that seems wrong to me.
Wouldn't it be better to use a stack allocated array for this temp storage, or is there any reason we want to save stack space ?