Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo: CVE-2023-49947 #2373

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module.

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

CVE-2023-49947 references codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo, which may be a Go module.

Description:
Forgejo before 1.20.5-1 allows 2FA bypass when docker login uses Basic Authentication.

References:

Cross references:
No existing reports found with this module or alias.

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

modules:
    - module: codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo
      vulnerable_at: 1.17.3
      packages:
        - package: n/a
cves:
    - CVE-2023-49947
references:
    - web: https://forgejo.org/2023-11-release-v1-20-5-1/
    - fix: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/44df78edd40076b349d50dc5fb02af417a44cfab

@tatianab tatianab self-assigned this Dec 4, 2023
@tatianab tatianab added the excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module. label Dec 7, 2023
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/547979 mentions this issue: data/excluded: batch add 11 excluded reports

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/592764 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 31 reports

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants