Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix LRO method test and rest test coverage #1433

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 7, 2022

Conversation

vam-google
Copy link
Contributor

This does:

  1. fixes LRO method mock value which for watever reason worked under proto 3.x.x (cpp implementaiton) but does not work under proto 4 and upb
  2. Add NO COVER to mock imports in tests as those lines are mutually exclusive depending on the python version it is runniin gunder.

This does:
1) fixes LRO method mock value which for watever reason worked under proto 3.x.x (cpp implementaiton) but does not work under proto 4
2) Add `NO COVER` to mock imports in tests as those lines are mutually exclusive depending on the python version it is runniin gunder.
@vam-google vam-google requested review from a team as code owners September 7, 2022 01:46
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the size: s Pull request size is small. label Sep 7, 2022
@vam-google vam-google requested review from atulep and parthea September 7, 2022 01:46
@parthea parthea added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Sep 7, 2022
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Sep 7, 2022
@parthea parthea added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Sep 7, 2022
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Sep 7, 2022
@parthea parthea merged commit c57a93f into googleapis:main Sep 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size: s Pull request size is small.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants