report: use details-element-polyfill from node_modules #6593
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
brendankenny
commented
Nov 17, 2018
| /* Edge doesn't recognize these, and the polyfill doesn't set block. https://github.com/javan/details-element-polyfill/issues/13 */ | ||
| details, summary { | ||
| display: block; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
brendankenny
commented
Nov 17, 2018
| @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ | |||
| "chrome-launcher": "^0.10.5", | |||
| "configstore": "^3.1.1", | |||
| "cssstyle": "1.1.1", | |||
| "details-element-polyfill": "2.1.1", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
locked to the same version we use for LR
exterkamp
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2018
patrickhulce
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2018
|
budgets
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
followup to #6465
Since LR now takes care of its own copy of
details-element-polyfill, we can remove it fromreport/html/third_party/and just rely on the one innode_modules, copying it into the report from there.