We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This example came up on discord (also related to https://discourse.julialang.org/t/nested-lambda-functions-overhead-ideas-for-algebra-of-functions/47335 )
function foo(x, p) f1 = (x;p)->x^2+p.a f2 = (x;p)->1/(x^2+p.b^2) f3 = (x;p) -> p.c1 * f1(x;p) + p.c2 * f2(x;p) return f3(x; p) end #= FixArgs.jl doesn't support do all the same transformations as lowering does, yet. It also does not support functions with keyword arguments (you can call functions with kwargs, but you cannot define functions with kwargs) =# using FixArgs: @xquote, xapply function foo2(x, p) f1 = @xquote (x, p) -> x^2 + getproperty(p, :a::::S) f2 = @xquote (x, p) -> 1/(x^2+(getproperty(p, :b::::S))^2) f3 = @xquote (x, p) -> getproperty(p, :c1::::S) * f1(x, p) + getproperty(p, :c2::::S) * f2(x, p) return xapply(f3, (x, p)) end # seems fine @code_llvm foo(1.0, (a=0, b=0, c1 = 0.5, c2 = 0.5)) # less fine @code_llvm foo2(1.0, (a=0, b=0, c1 = 0.5, c2 = 0.5))
field access doesn't appear to be the problem
function foo3(nt) f = @xquote nt -> getproperty(nt, :a::::S) return xapply(f, (nt,)) end julia> @code_llvm foo3((;a=1)) ; @ REPL[39]:1 within `foo3' define i64 @julia_foo3_3334([1 x i64]* nocapture nonnull readonly align 8 dereferenceable(8) %0) { top: ; @ REPL[39]:3 within `foo3' ; ┌ @ /Users/goretkin/projects/FixArgs.jl/src/eval.jl:95 within `xapply' @ /Users/goretkin/projects/FixArgs.jl/src/eval.jl:96 ; │┌ @ /Users/goretkin/projects/FixArgs.jl/src/eval.jl:44 within `xeval' ; ││┌ @ /Users/goretkin/projects/FixArgs.jl/src/eval.jl:104 within `_xapply' ; │││┌ @ /Users/goretkin/.julia/packages/FrankenTuples/LK9o9/src/FrankenTuples.jl:405 within `ftcall' ; ││││┌ @ Base.jl:33 within `getproperty' %1 = getelementptr inbounds [1 x i64], [1 x i64]* %0, i64 0, i64 0 ; └└└└└ %2 = load i64, i64* %1, align 8 ret i64 %2 }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
This example came up on discord (also related to https://discourse.julialang.org/t/nested-lambda-functions-overhead-ideas-for-algebra-of-functions/47335 )
field access doesn't appear to be the problem
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: