Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jaeger-query: upgrade to version 1.62 #1050

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

frzifus
Copy link
Collaborator

@frzifus frzifus commented Oct 7, 2024

Jaeger 1.62 released. It includes the multi tenancy fix.

https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/releases/tag/v1.62.0

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.20%. Comparing base (c7eb01b) to head (26f88df).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1050   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.20%   69.20%           
=======================================
  Files         110      110           
  Lines        7049     7049           
=======================================
  Hits         4878     4878           
  Misses       1881     1881           
  Partials      290      290           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 69.20% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Benedikt Bongartz <bongartz@klimlive.de>
@frzifus frzifus force-pushed the bump/jaeger-to-1.62 branch from 1901e46 to 26f88df Compare October 8, 2024 00:13
@frzifus frzifus enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2024 01:15
@frzifus frzifus merged commit 5bfe5d8 into grafana:main Oct 8, 2024
11 checks passed
@frzifus frzifus deleted the bump/jaeger-to-1.62 branch October 8, 2024 11:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants