[Bug]: test from netmaker

[theguy951357]

Contact Details

giggity@giggity.goo

What happened?

A bug happened! testing 1,2

Version

v0.24.2

What OS are you using?

No response

Relevant log output

Zobel's five points

* 		Abstract 
* 		An abstract is typically a single paragraph of about 50–200 words. The function of an abstract is
* 		to allow readers to judge whether or not the paper is of relevance to them. It should therefore be
* 		a concise summary of the paper’s aims, scope, and conclusions. There is no space for
* 		unnecessary text; an abstract should be kept to as few words as possible while remaining clear
* 		and informative. Irrelevancies, such as minor details or a description of the structure of the
* 		paper, are usually inappropriate, as are acronyms, mathematics, abbreviations, or citations. Only
* 		in rare circumstances should an abstract cite another paper (for example, when one paper
* 		consists entirely of analysis of results in another), in which case the reference should be given in
* 		full, not as a citation to the bibliography. Sentences such as “We review relevant literature” should
* 		be omitted. 
* 		Many abstracts follow a five-element organization:
* 		1. 
* 		A general statement introducing the broad research area of the particular topic being
* 		investigated. 
* 		2. 
* 		An explanation of the specific problem (difficulty, obstacle, challenge) to be solved. 
* 		3. 
* 		A review of existing or standard solutions to this problem and their limitations. 
* 		4. 
* 		An outline of the proposed new solution. 
* 		5. 
* 		A summary of how the solution was evaluated and what the outcomes of the evaluation were. 
* 		Thus a draft of an abstract can consist of five sentences, one for each of the points above.
* 		Introductions should be structured in much the same way, but with a paragraph or two, not a
* 		sentence, for each component. A valuable exercise is to read other papers, analyze their
* 		abstracts and introductions to see if they have this form, and then decide whether they are
* 		effective. 












* 		[
6:18 PM]



The more specific an abstract is, the more interesting it is likely to be. Instead of writing “space
* 		requirements can be significantly reduced”, for example, write “space requirements can be
* 		reduced by 60 %”. Instead of writing “we have a new inversion algorithm”, write “we have a new
* 		inversion algorithm, based on move-to-front lists”. 
* 		Many scientists browse research papers outside their area of expertise. You should notassume that all likely readers will be specialists in the topic of the paper—abstracts should be
* 		self-contained and written for as broad a readership as possible. 






Contributing guidelines

• Yes, I did.