Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overlap between landuse=landfill and natural #2410

Closed
Autharite opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Overlap between landuse=landfill and natural #2410

Autharite opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@Autharite
Copy link

Hello. When there is an overlap of landuse=landfill and natural=scrub or natural=scree, the brown colour of the landfill rendering disappears. However, when there is an overlap of landuse=landfill and natural=wood, the result is the brown colour of the landfill scattered with tree icons. I think this is not consistent (either the brown colour should always disappear or it should never disappear).
Note: when there is an ovelap of landuse=landfill and landuse=forest (which should not happen imho), the brown colour of the landfill rendering disappears too, and we get the green colour of the wood scattered with tree icons.

@imagico
Copy link
Collaborator

imagico commented Oct 11, 2016

Correct, for scrub this is being addressed in #2395.

For scree and bare_rock the situation is a bit different since these are not individual symbol patterns so rendering them above a different background color would appear as a completely different land cover and not a combination of scree/bare_rock and something different. Therefore separating base color and the pattern is not really desirable here.

Note in any case which base color is rendered depends on the ordering of the layer which is by size. So natural=scree (or any other natural or landuse area fills) will be rendered above landuse=landfill only if the polygon is smaller.

@kocio-pl kocio-pl added this to the Bugs and improvements milestone Nov 15, 2016
@imagico
Copy link
Collaborator

imagico commented Nov 17, 2016

Closing this - for scrub this is addressed in #2395 and as explained it is not desirable to do the same for the bare ground landcovers.

@imagico imagico closed this as completed Nov 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants