Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problems with episemae on multiple notes #72

Closed
olivierberten opened this issue Mar 10, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Problems with episemae on multiple notes #72

olivierberten opened this issue Mar 10, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@olivierberten
Copy link

See #40

http://gregobase.selapa.net/chant.php?id=2282

On the 3rd line of LU and 4th of gregobase, on the word "calceamenta": the original scores has 2 distinct episemae, while gregorio puts only a big one.

I just updated gregorio on the gregobase server but unfortunately it doesn't solve the problem... gregorio still draws a line between the 2 episemae...

Strangely enough, it wouldn't do it with ji__/i_ but it does with i_/i_ (and by the way, h!i__ doesn't work, I don't know whether it's related...)

Maybe i_/i_ and i/i__ should have a different behaviour...

@eroux
Copy link
Contributor

eroux commented Mar 11, 2015

Well, this is not really a bug, but more a feature... Gregorio always tries to make the longest episemus, but there's not control on that behavior... A possiblity I'm thinking about is to change this behavior with a tex option that would simply redefine grehepisemusbridge to nothing... Another solution would be to have _5 to get an episemus without any attempt at linking it to any other... What do you think?

@eschwab
Copy link
Contributor

eschwab commented Mar 11, 2015

It might be better to have the option in gabc. Some scores may have both linked and individual episemae.

@eroux eroux added this to the 4.0 milestone May 6, 2015
@henryso henryso self-assigned this May 6, 2015
@henryso henryso closed this as completed May 13, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants