Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HVAR/VVAR] >64k expansion; discussion #12

Closed
behdad opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

[HVAR/VVAR] >64k expansion; discussion #12

behdad opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@behdad
Copy link
Member

behdad commented Sep 14, 2021

That was already done, thanks to the work in googlefonts/colr-gradients-spec#319

The way we did it there, there will be a chance of misinterpretting the data by an old interpretter, of a new font if it's variable, has >64k glyphs, uses a VarIdxMap (aka DeltaSetIndexMap).

At the time I was convinced this was not a big deal. I still think it's okay. After all, we're used to newer fonts not working on older implementations. That they are not misinterpretted was always a nice touch, but ultimately a useless features.

@behdad behdad changed the title [HVAR/VVAR] >64k expansion; discussion [HVAR/VVAR] >64k expansion; discussion Sep 14, 2021
@behdad behdad added this to the BE 1.0 ~= OT 2.0 milestone Sep 15, 2021
@behdad behdad added the Implemented Implemented in HarfBuzz or doesn't need to label Jul 12, 2022
@behdad
Copy link
Member Author

behdad commented Jul 12, 2022

Nothing needs to be done.

@behdad behdad closed this as completed Jul 12, 2022
@behdad behdad removed the Implemented Implemented in HarfBuzz or doesn't need to label Jul 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant