You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The way we did it there, there will be a chance of misinterpretting the data by an old interpretter, of a new font if it's variable, has >64k glyphs, uses a VarIdxMap (aka DeltaSetIndexMap).
At the time I was convinced this was not a big deal. I still think it's okay. After all, we're used to newer fonts not working on older implementations. That they are not misinterpretted was always a nice touch, but ultimately a useless features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
behdad
changed the title
[HVAR/VVAR] >64k expansion; discussion
[HVAR/VVAR] >64k expansion; discussion
Sep 14, 2021
That was already done, thanks to the work in googlefonts/colr-gradients-spec#319
The way we did it there, there will be a chance of misinterpretting the data by an old interpretter, of a new font if it's variable, has >64k glyphs, uses a VarIdxMap (aka DeltaSetIndexMap).
At the time I was convinced this was not a big deal. I still think it's okay. After all, we're used to newer fonts not working on older implementations. That they are not misinterpretted was always a nice touch, but ultimately a useless features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: