Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: troubleshooting commit-hash #602

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jeromy-cannon
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request changes the following:

  • troubleshooting commit-hash in deploy and release

Related Issues

Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon self-assigned this Sep 18, 2024
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 12:56
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon merged commit 469f28e into main Sep 18, 2024
7 of 9 checks passed
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon deleted the deploy-release-commit-hash-2 branch September 18, 2024 12:57
swirlds-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
## [0.30.1](v0.30.0...v0.30.1) (2024-09-18)

### Bug Fixes

* check if data/upgrade/data/keys exisit ([#587](#587)) ([12bff59](12bff59))
* deploy and tag uses commit-hash from readme ([#601](#601)) ([5d72ffe](5d72ffe))
* more update readme testing ([#599](#599)) ([92d638b](92d638b))
* more update readme testing ([#600](#600)) ([6901f46](6901f46))
* troubleshooting commit-hash ([#602](#602)) ([469f28e](469f28e))
* update readme workflow to use boolean instead of string ([#594](#594)) ([1ec09f7](1ec09f7))
* update readme workflow to use version from semantic-release ([#598](#598)) ([387130f](387130f))
* use the commit hash from the readme publish ([#596](#596)) ([09d6fb4](09d6fb4))
@swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.30.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants