-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 455
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Providers of Large Size: Import is very slow in Python #3753
Comments
I think the changes we made in 0.18 might help here already: https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/cdktf/release/upgrade-guide-v0-18#python-performance-improvements-disable-root-level-provider-imports I think any other improvements would need to be made on the JSII side, so I would suggest checking if there is a similar issue here: https://github.com/aws/jsii |
@DanielMSchmidt Yes I referenced those changes above actually. It seems to have zero effect since the jsii assembly is imported at the root level, which is what slows down the runtime. My question here really is if the package you are building could be structured differently so that it doesn't generate one large JSII assembly but many. |
Module libraries always all submodules in from the root time python3 -c "import cdktf_cdktf_provider_aws.cloudwatch_log_group; print(type(cdktf_cdktf_provider_aws.alb_target_group))"
<class 'module'>
real 0m24.241s
user 0m24.020s
sys 0m2.288s This looks as if it was a mistake. Fixing it will significantly improve experience with CDKTF for Python users. |
Here is a similar issue reported on jsii aws/jsii#3389 |
Yeah I think we could side-step this entirely if the provider package for python was built similar to something like boto3-stubs, where each subject area is an extra package. I would love to have an interface like: pip install cdktf-cdktf-provider-aws[s3,iam,lambda] So this would require that instead of one giant AWS provider package, we would have multiple python packages. I know these providers are all generated so special tweaks per language like this might be hard to do, but it would seem like it's possible to work within the limitations of jsii, while still delivering a better experience. |
The problem is not in this being a single package, it's |
For sure the bulk of the time is the module imports. The jsii assembly load is a minimal impact comparatively, but still slows it down. I updated the issue description to designate the appropriate source of the slow down. |
Expected Behavior
When using Python, the time taken for a synth is only correlated to the volume of resources within a stack.
Actual Behavior
When using Python, running any operations with larger providers takes a long time due to lengthy module import load times. You could have a single resource and it would still take ~30s to even get started with the synth.
Steps to Reproduce
Versions
Running with the latest versions
Providers
No response
Gist
No response
Possible Solutions
This is really just a general issue for all providers, but only becomes a big problem for the large ones like AWS. Looking through the issues, this is related to #2792, which was ostensibly fixed by #3030.
Perhaps this is a regression due to some newer behavior in upstream packages but importing AWS is back to taking around 30 seconds and has been for quite a while. I've switched a few projects from python to typescript to get away from it but really it would be nice to not have to do that.
The bulk of the time is spent loading the submodules (thanks @giner). This is why I wonder if it's a regression for the changes made in #3030
Another source of slowness is the large gzipped assembly in
_jsii
.The root of the module loads it:
/init.py
And worth noting that resource modules also load it:
/foo/init.py
I know much of this is really just behavior of other libraries, and thus this might not be something you can control here. I also realize this is something you have probably already considered, but there is no discussion about it in issues I could find. Is it possible to instruct the package generation to build separate assemblies for each of the submodules of a provider package?
And you would then remove
from ._jsii import *
from the root. And resources would just import their specific jsii assembly.Workarounds
None that are feasible
Anything Else?
No response
References
azurerm
provider: Python package cdktf-cdktf-provider-azurerm extremely slow to import #2792Help Wanted
Community Note
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: