-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support for azurerm_container_group with private ip #2314
Comments
👍 we are also interested in this feature |
@mkyc Thanks for opening this feature request. We're working on this feature through below steps and we'd like to share the latest progress with you here:
|
Hi All, Any update on this please? i'm looking for a way of deploying a container vnet integrated. |
Updates? This would truly be a useful feature indeed, since it's in some cases blocking to use container groups that exposes them to the public. Thank you! |
@velith i lost all hope and turn to docker and kube as this one is vnet integrated and supports also windows images. |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
This issue was originally opened by @mkyc as hashicorp/terraform#19366. It was migrated here as a result of the provider split. The original body of the issue is below.
Use-cases
Allow creation of Azure Container Instances inside vnet described here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/container-instances/container-instances-vnet
this requires possibility to define
ipAddress.type: private
andnetworkProfile.id: <profile-id>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: