Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend azurerm_image to support searching for an image #454

Closed
clangaxon opened this issue Oct 25, 2017 · 3 comments · Fixed by #642
Closed

Extend azurerm_image to support searching for an image #454

clangaxon opened this issue Oct 25, 2017 · 3 comments · Fixed by #642

Comments

@clangaxon
Copy link

It would be very useful to modify azurerm_image to work like aws_ami and be able to at least do some basic filtering to return a particular image. Even just a name prefix search with support for 'most_recent' would allow e.g. maintaining a series of images with Packer and always deploying with the latest one.

Thanks!

@choppedpork
Copy link

Having noticed #436 just got closed I was about to raise the same request! Our current flow in AWS creates base AMIs with unique (timestamped) names and terraform just looks up the most recent image. Would be great to be able to do this in Azure, especially considering it's not currently possible to overwrite Azure managed disk images with packer (hashicorp/packer#5509).

@kmcquade
Copy link

+1

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 1, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 1, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants