-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
node_config tags shouldn't cause diffs on ordering change #12966
Comments
My changes in GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules#12014 partially resolve this - there will be a diff on ordering change, but no permadiff, as the tags will get updated in-place and so the diff will resolve after the first apply I am guessing running a |
Agreed that @wyardley 's fix might help here, I think we should check back once that is merged. It would depend how deterministic things are behaving. But also, the "real" fix here would be to update the implementation to be order-agnostic. |
Thanks, and agree on the "real" fix (not sure whether the API itself has ordering, though I'm guessing not, so it might be enough to use a fixed order within the state representation?). I did do a functional test locally with the built provider when I commented, and it did fix the permadiff. So probably this is Good Enough (TM) fix. It does actually try to update the nodepool, but I'm not sure if the actual labels as returned by the API change at all, or if it just updates the representation of it within Terraform state. |
Community Note
Description
The
google_container_cluster
andgoogle_container_node_pool
'snode_config
block should ideally treattags
as an unordered set of tags, rather than an (ordered) list of tags. This would help to avoid unnecessary diffs in case the order of the tags changes.For example, in the Terraform plan output below, this node pool needs to be replaced because the order of tags changed, even though there are no changes to the set of tags on this node pool:
The main place I've bumped into this is when using the
terraform-google-kubernetes-engine
module, which sets thetags
variable by concatenating a number of input variables. I've had situations where I've had to move tags from applying to "all" node pools vs a specific node pool, and this changed the order of tags built by the module.New or Affected Resource(s)
Potential Terraform Configuration
The change below should cause no diffs:
Considerations
The GKE API spec for NodeConfig models
tags
as an (ordered) list of strings.I don't know if it's the GKE API that determines whether that list of tags forces replacement (in which case we're probably out of luck) or whether the Terraform Google provider can determine that the set of tags has not changed, even if the order has.
b/300616557
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: