Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove create_timeout backwards incompatibilities. #10858

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2017

Conversation

paddycarver
Copy link
Contributor

A new create_timeout attribute was added that had some backwards
incompatibilities, and as per discussion in #10823, it was determined we
could make upgrading to 0.8.x easier by fixing them, without really
losing any functionality.

Because create_timeout is not something stored or transmitted to the
API, it's not something we need a ForceNew on. Also, because an update
wouldn't result in an API call, we can add a state migration to avoid a
false positive diff that requires people to plan and apply but doesn't
actually make an API call.

A new create_timeout attribute was added that had some backwards
incompatibilities, and as per discussion in #10823, it was determined we
could make upgrading to 0.8.x easier by fixing them, without really
losing any functionality.

Because create_timeout is not something stored or transmitted to the
API, it's not something we need a ForceNew on. Also, because an update
wouldn't result in an API call, we can add a state migration to avoid a
false positive diff that requires people to plan and apply but doesn't
actually make an API call.
@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Jan 3, 2017

LGTM! Thanks for removing this!

@paddycarver paddycarver merged commit 5fba757 into master Jan 3, 2017
@stack72 stack72 deleted the paddy_10823_create_timeout_force_new branch January 31, 2017 22:13
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 17, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants