Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Support Runtime Configurator #13189

Closed
hienle-hps opened this issue Mar 30, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Support Runtime Configurator #13189

hienle-hps opened this issue Mar 30, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@hienle-hps
Copy link

hienle-hps commented Mar 30, 2017

Are there any plans to support GCP's hierarchical key-value store Runtime Configurator or is it lower priority since Consul can provide the same functionality?

@danawillow
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @hienle-hps, no immediate plans (at least on my end) but feel free to send a PR if it's something you'd like to see sooner :)

@paddycarver
Copy link
Contributor

Just wanted to chime in on this that the priority is entirely independent of whether HashiCorp offers an alternative solution; our philosophy is that you should be able to use our tools with the tools that work best for you, regardless of who makes them. The low priority is just based on the number of user requests we see for it; that being said, if a bunch of people 👍 this issue or something looking for that resource, its priority would get bumped. We just only have so many hours. :)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 9, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants