Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

better control of generic field name parsing #194

Open
cdornan opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

better control of generic field name parsing #194

cdornan opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@cdornan
Copy link

cdornan commented Apr 8, 2021

Like Aeson allows a preprocessing function to be specified for record field names we need one for Cassava. Otherwise, for example, I will hardly ever be able to the generic deriving machinery. (Sorry if I missed another issue covering this, or indeed a way of gaining such control — not for a want of trying.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cdornan