Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not open source the SCP.NET #18

Open
caserzer opened this issue May 21, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Why not open source the SCP.NET #18

caserzer opened this issue May 21, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@caserzer
Copy link

Suggest to open source the scp.net not only the sample

@ravitandonrt
Copy link
Contributor

@caserzer I am +1 on this. To better surface this ask internally, can you please help with following information:

  • What features do you plan to extend in SCP.Net or you want the source as a reference?
  • Do you wish to run it on other Storm distros as well?

@caserzer
Copy link
Author

caserzer commented Jun 6, 2016

@rtandonmsft

  1. Plan to migrate the SCP.NET to the .net core enable running c# on Linux cluster
  2. Maybe, cloudera is an option

@ravitandonrt
Copy link
Contributor

ravitandonrt commented Jun 7, 2016

@caserzer Thanks for the reply.

For point:1, we already have that in works. SCP.Net worked more seamlessly with Mono than .Net Core, we have it working internally, getting it ready for GA on Linux. @rperi - my colleague who is working on that can share more details.

For point:2, yes, that is definitely a consideration. I was under the impression that Cloudera recommends Spark Streaming over Storm. Good to know, that is an option.

I will circle back the feedback to the release managers.

@lewisbenge
Copy link

@rtandonmsft is there any update on a solution for running on Linux? Looking at the solution, as you mentioned Mono seems pretty straight forward to get up and running if the SCP.NET code we made public. Would be keen to see how you guys progress to avoid having to write a bespoke Thrift implementation for Storm.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants