Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add preprocessor to link parameter widgets with loading indicators #2026

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 26, 2021

Conversation

philippjfr
Copy link
Member

@philippjfr philippjfr commented Feb 26, 2021

This means that parameter widgets generated from a Parameterized are jslinked to any reactive methods that depend on those parameters. This means the loading indicator is enabled as soon the widget is changed.

One good use case is the Gapminder demo which uses a Param based approach and is now automatically jslinked:

loading_indicator

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2026 (9cfdd6f) into master (1db5211) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2026      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.35%   84.32%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         176      176              
  Lines       20472    20486      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits        17269    17275       +6     
- Misses       3203     3211       +8     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
panel/param.py 87.90% <46.66%> (-1.17%) ⬇️
panel/links.py 87.58% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1db5211...9cfdd6f. Read the comment docs.

@philippjfr philippjfr merged commit 892e851 into master Feb 26, 2021
@philippjfr philippjfr deleted the param_loading_preprocessor branch February 26, 2021 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant