You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 19, 2023. It is now read-only.
Does MirBFT plan to add a follower module? Followers can synchronize requests but cannot participate in consensus. And, different nodes have different voting powers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, in principle both is possible, but currently the priority is focusing on making the basic protocol work, such that it can be integrated into useful projects. Creating a follower role and generalizing voting to use weights are very interesting add-ons to implement when the basic protocol is ready.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Does MirBFT plan to add a follower module? Followers can synchronize requests but cannot participate in consensus. And, different nodes have different voting powers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: