Why is it referred to as ToCamel instead of ToPascal?

[Imran-imtiaz48]

I found the naming of the ToCamel function a bit confusing when I first reviewed the code in camel_test.go. Initially, I thought it might be a typo in the source code. However, as I continued, I came across the ToLowerCamel function, which clarified that the naming was intentional.
I’m raising this issue because:

1. If this library is used in a project, other developers might get confused when they encounter the ToCamel function. This confusion could lead to misunderstandings, especially during code reviews.
2. Most developers associate the naming convention with PascalCase, making the current name inconsistent with common expectations.
3. Naming the function ToCamel may reduce code readability, as its purpose isn’t immediately clear without a deeper dive into the library, particularly the ToLowerCamel method.
   This is a fantastic library, but I believe addressing this naming issue would make it even better. Could this be reconsidered and updated?

[ccoVeille]

Everyone agree.

Unfortunately, it was reported multiple times, but never addressed

• Incorrect naming for Camel & LowerCamel #38

• Why is it called ToCamel instead of ToPascal? #46

• Changing ToCamel to ToPascal and ToLowerCamel to ToCamel for better readability  #47 was provided but it would be a breaking change