Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DEFECT] Running Tests Creates Too Many Files #1647

Closed
10 tasks done
dylanjm opened this issue Sep 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed
10 tasks done

[DEFECT] Running Tests Creates Too Many Files #1647

dylanjm opened this issue Sep 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
defect devel issues in current devel good first issue issues with straightforward fixes amenable to new RAVEN contributors priority_minor ROOK Issues for the new regression test system

Comments

@dylanjm
Copy link
Collaborator

dylanjm commented Sep 1, 2021


Defect Description

Describe the defect

When a user runs:

./run_tests -j 12

It creates a minimum number of 110 files and directories that Git shows as untracked files.

What did you expect to see happen?

Running the tests should not change the state of the repository.

What did you see instead?

I see that a bunch of files and directories were created.

Do you have a suggested fix for the development team?

Improve .gitignore file or provide a 'clean-up' method to the testing interface.

Describe how to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1.
2.
3.
4.

Screenshots and Input Files
Please attach the input file(s) that generate this error. The simpler the input, the faster we can find the issue.

Platform (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Version: [e.g. 22]
  • Dependencies Installation: [CONDA or PIP]

For Change Control Board: Issue Review

This review should occur before any development is performed as a response to this issue.

  • 1. Is it tagged with a type: defect or task?
  • 2. Is it tagged with a priority: critical, normal or minor?
  • 3. If it will impact requirements or requirements tests, is it tagged with requirements?
  • 4. If it is a defect, can it cause wrong results for users? If so an email needs to be sent to the users.
  • 5. Is a rationale provided? (Such as explaining why the improvement is needed or why current code is wrong.)

For Change Control Board: Issue Closure

This review should occur when the issue is imminently going to be closed.

  • 1. If the issue is a defect, is the defect fixed?
  • 2. If the issue is a defect, is the defect tested for in the regression test system? (If not explain why not.)
  • 3. If the issue can impact users, has an email to the users group been written (the email should specify if the defect impacts stable or master)?
  • 4. If the issue is a defect, does it impact the latest release branch? If yes, is there any issue tagged with release (create if needed)?
  • 5. If the issue is being closed without a pull request, has an explanation of why it is being closed been provided?
@dylanjm dylanjm added priority_minor defect devel issues in current devel ROOK Issues for the new regression test system labels Sep 1, 2021
@dylanjm dylanjm added the good first issue issues with straightforward fixes amenable to new RAVEN contributors label Sep 1, 2021
@dylanjm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dylanjm commented Jul 14, 2022

Approved to close via #1892

@dylanjm dylanjm closed this as completed Jul 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
defect devel issues in current devel good first issue issues with straightforward fixes amenable to new RAVEN contributors priority_minor ROOK Issues for the new regression test system
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants