You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we RECOMMEND that new evidence formats that want to be compatible with AR4SI define which claims are relevant to each trustworthiness vector bucket?
(The recommendation could go as far as even suggest appropriate values for specific circumstances.)
For reference, we have started looking at this for PSA here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should we RECOMMEND that new evidence formats that want to be compatible with AR4SI define which claims are relevant to each trustworthiness vector bucket?
(The recommendation could go as far as even suggest appropriate values for specific circumstances.)
For reference, we have started looking at this for PSA here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: