Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LP Sensitivity Deprecation Warnings #98

Closed
pulsipher opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #109
Closed

LP Sensitivity Deprecation Warnings #98

pulsipher opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #109
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@pulsipher
Copy link
Collaborator

JuMP has deprecated lp_rhs_perturbation_range and lp_objective_perturbation_range in favor of lp_sensitivity_report. We need to shift our API accordiningly.

@pulsipher pulsipher added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 1, 2021
@odow
Copy link
Contributor

odow commented Mar 1, 2021

Ah. So it turns out someone was using it! Was it not terribly slow?

@pulsipher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I imagine it probably was, though I didn't use it much. Since, InfiniteModels wrap around JuMP Models we just have some wrapper methods for lp_rhs_perturbation_range and lp_objective_perturbation_range so users can query them directly if they want to. See the source code below for more info: https://github.com/pulsipher/InfiniteOpt.jl/blob/ef3b82d5a07d6aa10e4707458c09c3d2654bc74a/src/results.jl#L744-L895

@pulsipher pulsipher added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Mar 3, 2021
@pulsipher pulsipher linked a pull request Apr 8, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants