We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check whether scraping flake and flakeheaven for ruff would not be the best idea to proceed.
flake
flakeheaven
Difficulty will emerge when choosing rules as most of that has to be hand verified.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Most of the current checks are implemented (and there are some additional ones which seem to fit well), namely:
pyupgrade
flake8-2020
flake8-bandit
flake8-blind-except
flake8-boolean-trap
flake8-comprehensions
flake8-datetimez
flake8-debugger
flake8-import-conventions
flake8-no-pep420
flake8-print
flake8-raise
flake8-return
flake8-self
flake8-type-checking
flake8-unused-arguments
eradicate
Currently missing for ruff which we would like to support:
ruff
flake8-noqa
flake8-annotations-coverage
flake8-annotations-complexity
flake8-cognitive-complexity is better supported via settings (see here)
flake8-cognitive-complexity
Sorry, something went wrong.
szymonmaszke
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Check whether scraping
flake
andflakeheaven
for ruff would not be the best idea to proceed.Difficulty will emerge when choosing rules as most of that has to be hand verified.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: