Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make path resolver no longer require whole node for construction #3321

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2016

Conversation

whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

This is some preliminiary work before we can get sharding in. Resolving a path now requires a certain bit of context and logic around what the path actually refers to (unixfs vs normal dag traversal)

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy why@ipfs.io

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added the status/in-progress In progress label Oct 19, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added this to the Directory Sharding milestone Oct 19, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping force-pushed the feat/resolver-refactor branch 2 times, most recently from 26f42c4 to 67c2a4e Compare October 25, 2016 22:04
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy <why@ipfs.io>
@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member Author

cc @Kubuxu @lgierth for review

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added need/review Needs a review and removed status/in-progress In progress labels Oct 25, 2016
@Kubuxu
Copy link
Member

Kubuxu commented Oct 26, 2016

LGTM

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping merged commit 17c629d into master Oct 26, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping deleted the feat/resolver-refactor branch October 26, 2016 18:29
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2016
hacdias pushed a commit to ipfs/boxo that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
make path resolver no longer require whole node for construction

This commit was moved from ipfs/kubo@17c629d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
need/review Needs a review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants