Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add option to enable go-multiplex experiment #3447

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2016

Conversation

whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy why@ipfs.io

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added the status/in-progress In progress label Nov 30, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added the need/review Needs a review label Dec 1, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping assigned ghost and Kubuxu Dec 1, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping force-pushed the feat/multiplex-experiment branch 2 times, most recently from 1629405 to eedbcc5 Compare December 3, 2016 00:23
mstpt.AddTransport("/spdy/3.1.0", spdy.Transport)

if mplexExp {
mstpt.AddTransport("/mplex/1.0.0", mplex.DefaultTransport)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since multiplex doesn't have a formal spec, the best we can do is follow its semver from its main implementation. See:

https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/7-properties.md#757-protocol-multicodecs

multiplex /multiplex/6.7.0

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy <why@ipfs.io>
@daviddias daviddias removed the need/review Needs a review label Dec 5, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping merged commit a1d2d47 into master Dec 5, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping deleted the feat/multiplex-experiment branch December 5, 2016 01:02
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping removed the status/in-progress In progress label Dec 5, 2016
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2016
@ajnavarro ajnavarro mentioned this pull request Aug 24, 2022
72 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants