Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to use IPFS check with a local IPFS node #9

Closed
momack2 opened this issue Jan 2, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #11
Closed

How to use IPFS check with a local IPFS node #9

momack2 opened this issue Jan 2, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #11

Comments

@momack2
Copy link
Contributor

momack2 commented Jan 2, 2022

It would be useful if IPFS Check had some instructions and a link to a docs page about how to find your multiadder via the webUI as an individual running a local IPFS node (ex via IPFS Desktop).

How to:

  1. Open IPFS WebUI "Status" page via IPFS Desktop drop down or by visiting "http://127.0.0.1:5001/ipfs/bafybeihcyruaeza7uyjd6ugicbcrqumejf6uf353e5etdkhotqffwtguva/#/" (with default config settings)
  2. Click the "Advanced" drop down to see more detailed node settings
  3. Choose the top entry in your list of "Addresses" (these are the various multiaddrs via which your node is addressable)
  4. Insert this address into the "multiaddr" text box
@aschmahmann
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed some instructions are needed here. Although choosing which multiaddress address to use is non-obvious for people who aren't familiar with networking things (e.g. that 10., 192.168., 127.0.0.1, ::, ... are all local addresses).

This would likely be made easier if users were allowed to just put in their peerIDs instead of their full multiaddrs. It would be less precise at debugging, but users could fallback to querying particular multiaddresses if they wanted to. It does require some additional logic to implement though.

@aschmahmann
Copy link
Contributor

@momack2 documenting how to use things currently is at #11.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants